Origin of Cholas- Tamil Myth
Cholas are said to be the three dynasties who ruled Tamil nadu from ancient times, But all three dynasties origin remain a question. Let us see the cholas origin.Sora
The etymology of the word Chola has been agreed upon by many historians and linguists to be derived from the Tamil word Sora or Chora. Moreover, numerous inscriptions confirm that the name of the Dynasty was Sora but pronounced today as Chola(sanskrit).
kalvar caste
Cholas belong to kalvar caste, Kalvar are said to be invaders in sangam literatures better known as kalabhras. The kalvar people still live around tanjor. So are the Cholas natives of Tamil nadu.
chalukya cholas
The Eastern Chalukyas ruled a kingdom in Vengi (eastern Andhra Pradesh) from about 625 until 1070, Then they took over the chola kingdom and dynasty. Earlier three generations of Eastern Chalukyan prince have married chola princess. So the question is how they did not face any resistance. In this background Rajendra Chalukya accended chola throne as Kulothunga chola I , thus annexing chola empire to Eastern chalukya empire and there again was no resistance eventhough Virarajendra died and his son and successor Adhirajendra was assassinated. That clearly caste doubts on cholas as any different from chalukya stock.
Chalukya author Bilhana gives a version of the background to Athirajendra’s troubles in his Vikramankadeva Charita.
'On hearing news of trouble and revolt in the Chola country following the emperor’s death, Vikramaditya, immediately marched to Kanchipuram to quell troubles there. Then he went to Gangaikonda Cholapuram, destroyed the forces of the enemy and installed the prince (Athirajendra) on the throne. After spending a month in the Chola capital, Vikramaditya apparently satisfied that peace was restored, returned to his country. '
Vikramaditya VI has come to chola country and he is called Kannadasandhivigrahi as said by his kannada inscription at the Ranganatha Swami Temple, Srirangam as peacemaker between fighting cousins.
Udayaditya, Choda wrote a treatise Udayadityalankaram in Kannada, 75 stanzas on the art of Poetry based on Dandin Kavyadarsa
And they never combined with pandyas and after accession Rajendra chalukya defeated pandyas and annexed the whole of tamil nadu. This raises the question whether chola are kannada stock.
Cholas and Prakrit.
All the Inscriptions are in prakrit, not in tamil. That has to be noted. If they are Tamil rulers then what was the hesitancy in promoting tamil.
Telugu chola
We do not know the origin of Cholas dynasty,but we know the origin of Telugu cholas pronounced Chodas from 5th century AD onwards. We have inscriptions on the following telugu dynasties who were feudataries of Chalukyas. The chodas trace their decent to Ikshavakus , who trace their origin to Manu, the cholas also trace their origin to Manu, Manu Needhi Cholan
- Velanati Cholas ( Ruled the Velanadu Region Current E.G,W.G and Krishna Districts)
- Renati Cholas (Ruled the Renadu Regions Current Cuddapah, Kurnool Regions)
- Pottapi Cholas (Ruled the Renadu Regions Current Cuddapah, Chittor Districts)
- Konidena Cholas (Ruled the Palanadu region Current Guntur, Prakasam Districts)
- Nannuru Cholas (Ruled the Pakanadu region Current Anantapur District)
- Nellore Cholas (Ruled the Nellore,Chittor, Chengalpeta and Cuddapah Regions)
But Rajendra chola came to help Eastern chalukya king Danarnava against Telugu choda king jata choda bhima(Amma II brother in law). Later after Kulothunga I acended throne as chola king, they shifted loyalty to Chola kings.
Pallava origin
Killivalavan was a chola king mentioned in Sangam Literature, and of a period close to that of Nedunkilli and Nalankilli , in the Purananuru and Agananuru.The etymology of Killi is kilai (Branch in Tamil)
The word Pallava means branch in Sanskrit, denoting that they are a later offshoot (Kilai-> Branch(tamil)) of Chutus (satkarnis).Pallava is rendered as Tondaiyar in the Tamil language. The Pallava kings at several places are called Thondamans or Thondaiyarkon.The territory of the Pallavas was known as Tundaka Visaya or Tundaka Rashtra.(tundaka - Branch) The Sanskrit meaning of Pallava is Kilai The Tamil Thondai means the same, It shows that Pallavas are descendants (Kilay or Pirivu) of Chutus(satakarnis).
Karnata dynasties Chalukyas and Rastrakutas call themselves Vallabhas and Pallava also from Karnata have called themselves vallabhas in some places, which translates to valavan in Tamil.
If we take the killi -> Kilai and Pallava -> kilai and vallabha -> valavan
We have killi valvan and it shows that killi valavan is generic term applied to pallava vallabha.
After the pallavas revenge against pulikesin II, Ganga king who had marital relations with chalukyas defeated the pallavas and chased them out of kanchi. So the pallavas shifted themselves to a place called Kaduvetti, which is now in chola country. Many of their inscriptions are from kaduveti. Only after this time we see cholas rising. Cholas might have marital relations with pallavas and putting killivalavan as one of their ancestors, shows their ancestors are pllavas. Until Nirputunga pallava cornation ,they were feudatories of pallavas.
This also solves myth Pallavas are not mentioned in Sangam literature ,so sangam literature has to be dated before pallavas.
Others
There is no tiger in chola country ,but their emblem is Tiger has to be noted, which show they are from outside Chola region.
Chola kingdom fell despite efforts to propup their proxy administration by Hoysalas of Halebidu against Pandyas.
Bengali 's
The Following is a interesting take from Bengali community. Some Sangam works talks about five tribes who settled in Tamil Nadu. These are Naga tribes from north who moved down to south.the
- VaeLir - the farmers,
- Mazhavar - the hill people who gather hill products, and the traders
- Naagar - people in charge of border security, who guarded the city wall and distant fortresses .
- Kadambar - people who thrive on forests
- Thiraiyar - the seafarers.
Bengali's say many Naga-worshipping tribes proceeded from Bengal as well as from other parts of Northern India to establish their supremacy in Tamil Nadu. Of these tribes, the Marans, the Cheras and the Pangala Thiraiyar interest us most. The Cheras, it is stated, proceeded to Southern India from the north-west of Pangala or Bengal and established the "Chera" kingdom of much historical note. It is significant that the Cheras are mentioned in the old Brahmin literature as occupying the eastern tract of the Magadba country. As to the Marans, who are said to have been the neighbours of the Cheras in Northern India, it is equally important to note, that the Pandya kings claim to be of Maran descent. The Marans, who were also called Maravars, are reported to have been a very fierce and warlike people, and that they worshipped the goddess Kali on the top-knot of whose hair stood an infuriated cobra snake. The Pangala Thiraiyars are recorded as the latest immigrants, and it is narrated of them, that they proceeded from the sea coast of Bengal by boat and founded the Chola kingdom at Kanchi. As the phrase Pangala or Bangala Thiraiyar is equivalent to (Tlra-Vanga), we can assert un- hesitatingly, that these people had received Aryan influence in Bengal before they left for the Madras coast.
So the question is who are cholas , From the above points they are not definitely tamils, they are either Telugu or kannada stock
THANKS TO http://controversialhistory.blogspot.com/2007/10/origin-of-cholas-tamil-myth.html
2 comments:
Lolz...this article is really funny...
Which chola inscription do you see in Prakrit?? Can you show one?? Kalbharas are dated post-Sangam age while Sangam mentions Chola. How do you come up with Chola Being Kalavar? More than that Kalabharas were Buddhist. So how can they be cholas??
How do you come up with chutu-satkarni origins of Pallava, when all the text mentions them of Kanchipuram origin. Nowhere there is any mention of Southeren migration of Pallavas. So your analogy of pallavas as Kannada origin doesnt hold. They were outright tamils.The Marans and Pandyas worshipped Matsya and not kali so get your facts right.
By the way your city of Kaduveti was never a capital of Cholas which was first at Poompuhar and then at Uraiyur and Tanjore. What evidence do you have for the fact that Chola country was taken over by Chalukyas. Even that Vikramankadeva Charita mention "Gangaikonda Cholapuram" which in itself was established after Rajendra Chola in mid-11th century. So your theory has no basis at all..
The origin of Tamil is shrouded in mystery. Even if as per KKPILLAI and earlier scholars are accepted the difference in Sangam Tamil and Kalbra Tamil is vastly different. The retention of Tamil words throughout South of Vindhyas and influence of Grihya Sutras even now needs deeper study. If we closely follow the Asokan edicts the nearest frontier is KODA then PADA then SATHIYAPUTRA then KETHALAPUTRA. That is region of Telugu Chodas then Uchangi Pandyas then Adiyamans them Cheras then Tamrapanni. The Alupas(Uchangi Pandyas were matrilineal a fact recorded by Megasthenes). The Madurai Pandiyas could have ruled extreme south and eastern Ceylon commonly known as Tamropanni. Further Pandya country was always a strong Jain center. There were two sections living in the entire coast barring extreme south. The northern Prakrit and southErnst Tamil. The Cholas even though they belonged to Krishna Godavari belt always supported Tamil. We had to delink ethnicity and language. The great Banas were descendants of Brihatpalayanas but became Tamils. The Muttaraiyar belonged both Gangas as well as Banas and one of the earliest Muttaraiyar Dananjaya was the elder son of Telugu Nalladi Chola(Nallidi kone son of Kochenganan). Further The AryaChkravarthikal of Jaffna were Bhumihar of Bihar who actively supported Tamil. The vassals of VikramadityaVI of Kalyan included CholaMaharaja Pandiyaraja and Kadava of Kanchi. Hence Tamil represented a way of life and Prakritam another way of life. It is futile to identify kings with ethnicity or caste.
Post a Comment